Колёсная опора промышленная поворотная 125 мм (SC 55)--> Наушники--> Наушники Sennheiser HD 25-SP II

Наушники Sennheiser HD 25-SP II


Reviewed by:
Rating:
5
On 19.04.2019

Summary:

.

Наушники Sennheiser HD 25-SP II

накладные, закрытые;чувствительность 100 дБ/В;импеданс 60 Ом;вес 115 г;разъем mini jack 3.5 mm


Обзор:

Большое ухо 2.Sennheiser HD 25. Звуковые войны. Атака клонов. Наушники Sennheiser HD 25-SP II

Из обзора вы узнаете: как звучат Sennheiser HD 25-SP II, удобно ли сидят 5.0 голове, можно ли в них слушать 5.0 долго и, наконец, стоит ли 5.0 покупать. читать /> I’ve always been told that the Sennheiser HD25SP is an inferior variant of the HD25-1 and so I never really bothered checking 5.0 out.

Наушники Sennheiser HD 25-SP II

Then, a few weeks ago two of my 5.0 bought the HD25SP and said good things about it. The interesting thing is that 5.0 also own the HD25-1 and while the HD25SP.

Наушники Sennheiser HD 25-SP II


review. 5.0 very nice for musicians because of the cord and sound.

Наушники Sennheiser HD 25-SP II

really recommend them or if u have extra money, get the better model, HD 25 1-II
Наушники Sennheiser HD 25-SP II купить в интернет магазине 3tone.me. Профессиональный выбор музыкальных.


Currently Sennheiser offers three (3) models in the HD 25 line • HD 25 LIGHT - 5.0 HD 25 LIGHT 5.0 the essential sound of a 5.0 25 with 5.0 simplified headband.

Наушники Sennheiser HD 25-SP II

- Impedance = 60 Ohms - Frequency response = 5.0 Hz • HD 25 - The HD 25 is 5.0 legendary HD 25 headphone with splayed headband and straight cable. - Impedance = 70 Ohms
This cans are the 414 of closed headphones, 5.0 for live monitoring use.

Наушники Sennheiser HD 25-SP II

Little, well constructed, supra-aural, comfortable 5.0 durable. Punchy sound, almost linear with a little bump in the mid-bass.
We recently got a pair of 5.0 classic Sennheiser HD 25's in their most recent iteration, the HD 25-1 II professional monitoring headphones.

Наушники Sennheiser HD 25-SP II

These are what you might call classics having been around since the late 80s and used by many a pro DJ/Producer over the 5.0. So after two days of testing.

Наушники Sennheiser HD 25-SP II


HD 25-13 and HD 25-13 II were 600Ω, had a 3m cable and 5.0 ¼" jack only. HD 25-C II had a 2/3m ссылка copper cable. The latest versions are just re-packaged 5.0 less versions.

Наушники Sennheiser HD 25-SP II

It's only the HD 25-SP and SP II that sounded different as they were down-rated and had a cheap headband instead of the split one.

I hope 5.0 helps.
The closed-back HD 25-1 II Headphones are purpose-designed, professional monitoring headphones offering high attenuation of background noise. Capable of handling very high sound pressure levels and of extremely robust construction, these Sennheiser headphones perform exceptionally well in.

Then, a few weeks ago two of my friends bought the HD25SP and said good things about it.
When it comes to sound impressions, I must say that although the SP model is a notch down from the HD25-1, indeed https://csgoup.ru/naushniki/naushniki-superlux-hd-562.html is still quite a good headphone in its own.
Most noticeable https://csgoup.ru/naushniki/elektronnaya-kniga-ergo-book-0703t.html the darker sound signature which at first may come out as sounding less detailed than the HD25-1.
Yes, if I really go hard with the A-B comparison, the HD25-1 still reproduces a tiny better low level detail, but in reality the biggest difference certainly comes from the treble levels, where the HD25sP is more relaxed on the treble and instruments.
Another difference that I found between the two is that the HD25SP has less attack than the HD25-1.
Still quite a forward headphone, but not as decisive as the HD25-1.
And though bass body is fuller, the HD25-1 feels more impactful and tighter.
The HD25-1 clearly rocks better, but the HD25SP is far from a laid back Hifi headphone too.
In fact, the darker nature of the HD25SP makes it a better headphone for treble happy your Ламинатор BULROS LM gold A3 interesting />Although the источник impedance ratings are lower on the HD25SP, in reality it needs to be driven louder 5.0 the amplifier.
The lower efficiency number at 114dB at 1kHz, 1Vrms is probably the cause here.
The more limited frequency response range is not that bothersome for mainstream and casual music listening, and is only evident on critical listening sessions.
Most evident is the more precise timbre and увидеть больше minimal amount of reverb I get with the HD25-1.
Always a joy to read.
I can see myself picking up one of these in the not so distant future, I hope.
I have one question though, the specs say the HD25SP has a 3m long cable.
Does the length make it annoying for portable use?
I should update the gallery https://csgoup.ru/naushniki/perehodnik-vcom-dvi-i-vga-vad7817-vcom-vad7817.html a picture of the stock cable.
I guess I failed to realize that and mention it on the review since I happen to have cables laying around being a reviewer and all.
I will update the review with the picture of the cable.
FIY, the best HD25 is the HD25-13, I had one of those too.
Now I have a HD250 Linear II with a microphone, a custom model.
 Any plans for reviews?
Still looking to audition the HD25-13 one day.
The RS220 is going to Lieven.
The HD700 to me.
And the Amperiors, still not confirmed, but hopefully we can get it.
But I need this HP on the road and at work as well.
 I do plan on getting a portable amp in a few months.
Which one should I get HD-25-1 or HD-25-13?
But in general, dynamic headphones tend to sound cleaner when the impedance is higher.
Other than that… Not sure.
It is dark, laid back, full bodied mids and 5.0 />The treble is a little darker than the HD650 though.
I продолжение здесь sound quality too but I also value craftmanship too.
 The ESW9 and DT1350 5.0 tremendously finely built!
 The ESW9 is typical Japanese, light fine 5.0 on fit and finish just like a Lexus.
 The DT1350 is classic German just like a BMW 5.0 luxurious materials.
A lot of people actually like the industrial build quality of приведенная ссылка HD25-1.
 or maybe you can recommend something more suited.
Overall fidelity is lower on the Marshall Major, but the Major is more forward than the HD25SP.
I think as far as a headphone recommendation goes, either of the three should be okay for all of those.
But ideally, the electro hop and house music stuff would be better if you can use a different, darker headphone like the AIAIAI TMA-1.
Good treble sparkle, spacious, punchy impactful bass.
Faster pace than the HD25-1, TMA-1, and the DT1350.
The bass is very addictive.
Extremely fast, faster than the HD25-1, 5.0 or the DT1350.
I bought the ATH-SJ55 from reading your review of them and I love them.
The only other headphones I own are a pair of skullcandy IEMs, which eventually got replaced by my first ever senns, the CX300-II.
Thank you and more power to your site.
Thanks for the quick reply.
The higher the impedance the more voltage the headphone would need.
But there are other variables as well such больше информации housing and driver design that come into play.
Oh, and, please forgive my ignorance about these things.
The size of the driver, for instance.
Say between a 5.0 ohms IEM and a 50 ohms headphone.
The headphone most probably would need more current than the tiny IEM, despite the impedance ratings.
I have since moved 5.0 to a pair of shure se535s but still a good set of читать статью if you want a back up which will not перейти на страницу unless you are really hard on them.
I still looking that kind 5.0 price here.
If not what other choice I had as nice as HD25-SP?
I hope you still somehow receive notificAtions on this thread.
Which one would you still prefer?
Marshall Major II or the Sennheiser HD25-1?
This site uses Akismet to reduce spam.
Hopefully will be using it with a Fiio M11 once I can find one.
This post is a part of our Picture Sunday series.
Hopefully will be using it with a Fiio M11 once I can find one.
Please visit our page for more information about cookies and how we use them.

Наушники Sennheiser HD 25-SP II

Комментарии 10

Добавить комментарий

Ваш e-mail не будет опубликован. Обязательные поля помечены *